• OMB will track phonemarks, but last-minute-marks present more of a problem

    Christin T. Baker, the associate director for communications in the Office of Management and Budget, voicemails and emails that OMB already tracks “nontraditional sorts of ways of getting projects funded” in its database, something they’ll continue to do in 2008. Here’s one example from 2005, gotten by downloading the CSV data from the site into an excel spreadsheet, sorting on the field called “Citation_Source” and looking for the ones that aren’t bills or conference reports.

    Citation
    Source: Senator Stevens’ colloquy
    Reference: Congressional Record S12030
    Method: User entered excerpt
    Citation Excerpt: The Following Language is from Congressional Record S12030 December 8, 2004. Senator Ted Stevens Comments on FY 05 Omnibus Appropriations Bill: I would like to take this opportunity to clarify a few points in the bill to provide guidance to those who will implement it. Denali Commission: The conferees provided $67,000,000 for the Denali Commission. In addition to the allocations outlined in the bill itself, there are a number of other projects to which the Denali Commission should give priority consideration: $2,000,000 for the Tok/Chistochina Intertie project; $500,000 for the Fire Island extension; $146,000 for Chenega Bay Utilities

    Kind of amazing that one senator’s floor speech can have the force of law. And here’s another exmaple of earmarks made, not by statute or conference report but rather by a May 17th, 2005, letter that redirects some HHS funding for fiscal year 2005 (the link takes you to a PDF).

    As to the news that Rep. David Obey and House Democrats intend to sidestep their own rules by not disclosing earmarks until the last minute (that is, after the House and Senate conferees have agreed to a final version of the bill), Baker says, “It’s a very short time frame from when the conference report is filed and then voted on so it definitely makes our jobs a lot harder in terms of tracking the earmarks.” OMB had planned to track them through each step of the committee process–if Obey and the House Democrats keep them secret, well, as Baker says, “That certainly makes our jobs much more difficult.”

    Whistleblower Complaints to DoD  Free PACER docket search from Justia → 
  • 0 Comments on OMB will track phonemarks, but last-minute-marks present more of a problem
    Leave a Comment

(also available as a full page with descriptions)

The Site may contain links to Internet sites that are not operated by Sunlight Foundation. These links are provided as a service and do not imply any endorsement of the activities or content of these sites, nor any association with their operators. Sunlight Foundation does not control these Internet sites and is not responsible for their content, security, or privacy practices. We urge you to review the privacy policy posted on web sites you visit before using the site or providing personal information.


This work by Sunlight Foundation is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.